Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Doctrix Periwinkle's avatar

We still have that conference call set up where I work! Every time I have to use it now, my fingers *stumble* over the keys, when once they *sashayed* over a similar keyboard.

You see, your experience using that phone to set up talks between authors and your students reminds me that I used to do something similar when I hosted a talk radio show for our college radio station. This was mainly an excuse for me to get to interview authors I liked. Back in those heady days, no one really knew how to use the internet to search for things, so as long as I called a publisher and spoke in an authoritative voice about wanting to interview one of their authors, the agent assumed that the left-side-of-the dial frequency and call signal meant I was with public radio, not a college station. I never disabused them of that notion.

Expand full comment
Ben Quick's avatar

"One exception to this rule is dialogue. Dialogue should nuance how each speaker says their lines in the spoken words themselves. Start throwing too many action verbs around (he groaned, she spat) and your reader will soon start thinking sounds like writing instead of just dreaming the scene." This is my feeling, as well. If an author wants to convey actions or body language during dialogue, this can either be implied through the dialogue or separated from the dialogue by alternate means. Slow the writing down and mix a couple of descriptive sentences into the space between the spoken words. A "he whispered" or "she bellowed" once in awhile is fine. That said, I'm a huge fan of conversations that consist only of spoken words and let the reader fill in the blanks. Something like this:

Question/statement from speaker one.

Response from speaker two.

And so forth, for as long as needed. No parentheses required.

Thanks, Josh!

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts